Fine-tuning
nitrogen management continues to be a priority for both cost-conscious and environmentally
aware corn growers in Ontario. A switch to sidedress application rather than
pre-plant broadcast of nitrogen fertilizer is often presented as a move that
will allow growers to use nitrogen more efficiently. There can be several reasons
behind this potential increase in nitrogen use efficiency. Growers on sandy
soils may argue that delaying nitrogen applications until June reduces the risks
of heavy rains in May moving nitrate below the rooting zone. Similarly, corn
producers on heavy clay soils may want to avoid pre-plant applications of nitrogen
in fear that wet periods may cause the soil to be waterlogged, resulting in
N losses through denitrification. From my perspective, the more appealing reason
for applying nitrogen in the sidedress window is the opportunity to use the
pre-sidedress soil nitrate test to get a better idea of the amount of residual
nitrate in the soil and therefore be able to adjust nitrogen application rates
accordingly.
Table
1 |
||||
Yield
(bu/A)
|
||||
Injector spacing (in.) |
Plow
|
Chisel
|
Disk
|
No-till
|
DeKalb trials | ||||
30 |
159
|
157
|
163
|
146
|
60 |
158
|
157
|
157
|
143
|
Elwood trials | ||||
30 |
-
- -
|
119
|
121
|
118
|
60 |
-
- -
|
117
|
125
|
121
|
-
- - = no data collected
|
In addition to,
or perhaps for some, even more important, than the nitrogen use efficiency arguments,
are the possibilities of reducing overall costs and increasing planting timeliness
by sidedressing. Costs are reduced by capitalizing on the lower nitrogen prices
often associated with anhydrous ammonia, compared to other nitrogen sources,
and efficiencies are increased by eliminating one operation prior to the corn
planting. Another option in trying to make N application as efficient as possible
is to use sidedress applicators that apply nitrogen in a skip-row pattern, with
an injector knife running down every other inter-row.
Studies in Illinois indicated that nitrogen (anhydrous ammonia) injected between
every other row resulted in comparable yields to injection between every row.
This finding was true regardless of the tillage system being used (see Table
1). In some cases, fear of moving to a skip-row system stemmed from situations
where root growth was considered to be sub-optimal (i.e., no-till or perhaps
in heavy soils). The Illinois data suggested that no-till situations were of
no concern, which was also supported by Ontario research and demonstrations
conducted by the Middlesex Soil and Crop Improvement Association. A number of
these Middlesex sites were conducted under no-till conditions, and there was
no negative yield response to the skip-row pattern compared to applying the
nitrogen in every inter-row (see Table 2). The Illinois results also suggested
the nitrogen application rate did not affect the performance of the skip-row
system (see Table 3).
Werner Seegelken of the Middlesex SCIA summarized their findings in the following
points:
1. 40% savings in fuel costs!
2. 50% decrease in wear on the applicator knives.
3. Only half as much chance for cultivator blight!
4. The little tractor can now pull the applicator. So the big tractor
can be left with the tires set wide, there is no need to buy narrow tires for
it, and the huge turning radius of the front wheel assist is no longer tramping
corn.
5. Only half the investment is required for new, better technology for
getting the anhydrous in the ground and closing the slot.
6. Less soil disturbance. This means less potential for soil erosion
and a more level field for soybeans next year.
With this system, injector positions can be adjusted to avoid placing an injector
in the wheel track. This is viewed as a real benefit with anhydrous, as getting
a good seal when applying in any tire tracks is always more difficult. In following
a six-row corn planter pattern, the three-injector system fits great, no wheel
tracks to run in and no need to run injectors in the guess rows. When matching
the driving pattern for a planter of 8, 12 or 16 rows, and if you want to avoid
tire tracks, the outside two injectors must be adjusted tohalf-rate application,
and will run in the guess row track twice (i.e., an 8-row planter requires a
5-shank applicator, similarly a 7-shank applicator applying guess rows twice
would cover a 12-row planter.) Most operators suggest using a double-tube system
to keep the system operating at capacity and to avoid the need to reduce travel
speed. Use a double-tube knife with two hoses going to each knife; the outside
knives would require only one hose to give the half-rate application.
Table
2
The effect of nitrogen injector spacing on corn yield on field sites in Middlesex County. Source: Middlesex County Soil and Crop Improvement Association. |
|||
Year
|
#
of Trials
|
Skip
Row(60 inchs pacing)
|
Every
Row(30 inch spacing)
|
|
|
corn
yield (bu/ac @ 15.5%)
|
|
1999
|
4
|
150
|
151
|
1998
|
2
|
166
|
164
|
1997
|
5
|
123
|
123
|
Average
|
141
|
140
|
While most of the
research is based on anhydrous ammonia, there is no reason to expect that other
nitrogen forms could not be applied in a skip-row fashion. It is also worth
noting that if you are using UAN and are therefore no longer concerned about
sealing in the wheel track, you could avoid the need for running injectors in
the guess rows. This would also reduce the number of injectors by one (i.e.,
6 injectors would do for a 12-row planter; you would follow the planting pattern,
but some injectors would run in wheel tracks).
Table
3
The effect of nitrogen injector spacing on corn yields at various nitrogen application rates at DeKalb, Illinois. Source: Illinois Agronomy Handbook 1999-2000. University of Illinois. |
|||
Nitrogen
|
Rate
|
(lbs/acre)
|
|
Injector
spacing (in.)
|
120
|
180
|
240
|
--------------------------
corn yield (bu/A) ---------------------------
|
|||
30
|
171
|
176
|
181
|
60
|
170
|
171
|
182
|
Perhaps one word of caution is in order. If you are on heavy textured soils and operating a reduced tillage corn planting system, you may want to set up a few trials with the skip-row pattern compared to an every row pattern before adopting the idea for the whole farm. Also note that if you are moving to a sidedress system, be sure to provide some nitrogen (20-30 lbs N/acre) through the planter to ensure adequate N fertility to the young crop.